Chipotle's newest thought-provoking film is every bit as good as the last, in my biased opinion, and this time, there's an app to go with it. I declare myself biased because my husband works for Chipotle, so some may discount my opinion based on that. Thought I'd better throw that tidbit out there right away. "The Scarecrow," with it's simple, clear visuals and haunting remake by Fiona Apple of the song "Pure Imagination" from the movie "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" challenges how we think about fast food. I won't spoil it for you, but I will challenge you to throw off a bit of the denial the next time you take your family to the restaurant with the golden arches. By all means, what you eat is your choice, but no matter your choice (and I've been known to make some pretty poor choices), at least understand what you are putting into your body and what the industries you are supporting do to the animals you are eating. There ARE better choices out there. Chipotle is one of them.
Please check out "The Scarecrow."
The littles and I have watched "The Scarecrow" a couple of times. The first time, I let them just watch it to see what they would pull from it on their own. They understood that it was sad, and they felt bad for the animals.
Porter (6) asked "Why are these Chipotle things always so sad?"
It's hard to explain it to a six-year-old. You can't really go into the politics of it all, so I did my best: "They are supposed to make you feel sad, because they want you to feel so strongly that it changes the way you think."
The second time we watched, I did some commentary and paused it if they asked questions. Porter seemed to understand as I explained that the people are just eating the food, and they don't know about all of the chemicals in it, and they don't know how badly the animals are treated. All they see is the cute little store front and the yummy-looking food, so they buy it, and they eat it. What "The Scarecrow" is showing us is what goes on in reality. "Oh, so that's why you won't take us to McDonald's and fast food very often," he concluded, then asked "but why can't we just eat the good kind of animals, and why can't the fast food places use those?...Chipotle does."
So he got the message perfectly. "Exactly, Porter." I said. "They don't because it's cheaper to buy the yucky stuff, so that means they make more money."
"That's just wrong," he declared. Bingo.
Campbell (4), my little self-proclaimed vegetarian, had a few more questions and had some very strong feelings: "The poor cows need us. And the pigs. And the chickens." Yes. "Mommy, I want to save a cow."
I asked her how we could do that.
"We could make a home for it at the farm."
"That's a great idea. But we don't have a farm," I reminded her.
"So what can we do?" she asked.
"Well, how about we don't buy the animals from the factories. If we don't eat many animals, and the ones we do eat come from little farms that treat them right–rather than factories–we'll be helping the farmers who are doing the right thing. If everyone does that, then the guys that are doing the wrong thing will go out of business and they won't be able to hurt us or the animals any more."
She thought for a minute and then spoke again. "But how do we get everyone to do that? Mommy, can we change the world?"
And that's just the question. Can we?